Cut and Fill Calculator

Calculate cut and fill volumes for site grading. Enter existing and proposed elevations to balance earthwork and minimize hauling costs.

sq ft
ft
sq ft
ft
$/CY
%
Bank Cut Volume
370.4 CY
10,000 cu ft from 5000 sq ft × 2 ft
Bank Fill Required
222.2 CY
6,000 cu ft from 4000 sq ft × 1.5 ft
Loose Cut Volume
500.0 CY
After 1.35× swell — truck volume
Compacted Reuse
309.6 CY
Shrink 88% × 95% target
Site Balance
Net Export
Net 148.1 CY excess
Haul Trucks
7 loads
87.4 CY @ 14 CY/truck
Haul Cost
$1,048.89
$12.00/CY × 87.4 CY
Balance Ratio
166.7%
Cut ÷ Fill — 100% = balanced

Cut vs Fill Balance

Cut 370
Fill 222
Per-Section Breakdown (4 sections)
MetricPer SectionTotal
Cut Volume92.6 CY370.4 CY
Fill Volume55.6 CY222.2 CY
Loose Volume125.0 CY500.0 CY
Compacted Reuse77.4 CY309.6 CY
Soil Swell & Shrinkage Reference
Soil TypeSwell FactorShrinkageWeight (lb/CY)
Sand / Gravel1.25×5%~2,600
Loam / Topsoil1.30×10%~2,400
Common Earth1.35×12%~2,800
Dense Clay1.40×15%~3,000
Rock / Shale1.50×20%~3,400
Planning notes, formulas, and examples

About the Cut and Fill Calculator

Cut and fill is the foundation of site grading — removing earth from high areas (cut) and placing it in low areas (fill) to create a level building pad, road, or designed slope. The goal is to balance cut and fill volumes so that all excavated material is reused on-site, eliminating the need for expensive off-site hauling or imported fill.

This calculator uses a simplified grid method where you define sections of your site with existing and proposed elevations. It sums the cut volumes and fill volumes separately, then shows whether your site is balanced or if you'll need to import or export material.

For contractors and civil engineers, cut-and-fill balancing is one of the most important cost-saving techniques in site development. Even small changes in proposed grade can shift thousands of dollars in earthwork costs.

When This Page Helps

Balanced earthwork saves money. If you can reuse all your cut material as fill, you eliminate hauling costs entirely. This calculator helps you find the balance point and estimate the cost impact of bringing in or removing material.

How to Use the Inputs

  1. Divide your site into grid sections of equal area.
  2. For each section, enter the existing elevation and proposed elevation.
  3. Enter the grid section area (length × width of each grid square).
  4. Review total cut volume, fill volume, and net balance.
  5. Adjust proposed elevations to minimize the imbalance.
  6. Factor in swell when reusing cut material as fill.
Formula used
For each grid cell: Depth = Existing Elevation − Proposed Elevation If Depth > 0 → Cut Volume = Area × Depth If Depth < 0 → Fill Volume = Area × |Depth| Total Cut = Σ Cut Volumes ÷ 27 (yd³) Total Fill = Σ Fill Volumes ÷ 27 (yd³) Net = Total Cut − Total Fill

Example Calculation

Result: 185 CY cut / 139 CY fill / 46 CY net export

With 4 equal sections of 2,500 sq ft each: 2 sections average 2 ft of cut (5,000 ft³ = 185 CY) and 2 sections average 1.5 ft of fill (3,750 ft³ = 139 CY). The net is 46 CY of excess cut that must be exported off-site.

Tips & Best Practices

  • Use smaller grid squares for a closer estimate on irregular terrain.
  • Account for swell: 1 CY of bank cut yields 1.2–1.4 CY loose, but compacts to about 0.85–0.95 CY in fill.
  • Balance your design grade to minimize the net cut/fill difference.
  • Topsoil should be stripped and stockpiled separately before cut-and-fill begins.
  • On slopes, account for the toe and crest of embankments in your volume calculations.
  • Review the geotechnical report — some cut material may not be suitable for structural fill.

The Grid Method Explained

Divide your site into equal squares (e.g., 25×25 ft). At each grid intersection, record the existing elevation (from a survey) and the proposed elevation (from the design). The difference determines whether that cell is cut or fill, and the volume equals the cell area times the depth.

Balancing Your Site Design

The most cost-effective grading plan balances cut and fill. If you have excess cut, lower the proposed grade slightly. If you need more fill, raise it. Small adjustments can shift hundreds of cubic yards. Work with your civil engineer to find the optimal balance point.

Swell and Shrinkage in Practice

When soil is excavated, it swells 10–40%. When it's placed and compacted as fill, it shrinks to roughly its original bank volume (or slightly less). The net effect means you need about 5–10% more cut than fill to achieve volumetric balance. Professional estimators apply adjustment factors for swell and shrinkage.

Haul Routes and Mass Diagrams

For linear projects (roads, highways), engineers use mass diagrams to optimize the direction and distance of earthwork movement. The goal is to minimize haul distance by moving material to the nearest feasible fill location. This technique can save 20–40% on hauling costs compared to unplanned earthwork.

Sources & Methodology

Last updated:

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Cut is the removal of earth from high points on a site. Fill is the placement of earth in low points. The goal is to balance the two so that material removed from cuts is used for fills, minimizing the need for importing or exporting material.