CHP Efficiency Calculator

Calculate the overall efficiency of a Combined Heat and Power (cogeneration) system. Compare CHP thermal plus electrical efficiency to separate generation.

kW
kW
kW
hrs
$/MWh
Efficiency of standalone boiler for comparison
%
Electrical Efficiency
35.7%
Benchmark for recip engine: 35%
Thermal Efficiency
39.3%
Benchmark: 40%
Overall CHP Efficiency
75.0%
Combined electrical + thermal output ÷ fuel input
Power-to-Heat Ratio
0.91
Benchmark: 0.88
Waste / Losses
25.0%
Energy not captured as useful output
Annual CHP Fuel Cost
$630,000.00
7,500 operating hours
Separate Generation Cost
$891,176.00
Grid electricity + standalone boiler
Annual Cost Savings
$261,176.00
CHP vs. separate heat & power
Energy Flow Breakdown
Electrical 35.7%
Thermal 39.3%
Losses 25%
ElectricalThermalLosses
CO₂ Avoided: 741 tons/year vs. separate generation
Annual Production Summary
MetricValue
Electricity Generated7,500 MWh/yr
Useful Heat Recovered8,250 MWh/yr
CHP Fuel Cost$630,000.00/yr
Equivalent Separate Cost$891,176.00/yr
Net Annual Savings$261,176.00/yr
Prime Mover Benchmarks
TechnologyElec. Eff.Therm. Eff.OverallP/H Ratio
Reciprocating Engine35%40%75%0.88
Gas Turbine30%45%75%0.67
Micro Turbine28%50%78%0.56
Fuel Cell42%35%77%1.2
Steam Turbine20%55%75%0.36
Planning notes, formulas, and examples

About the CHP Efficiency Calculator

Combined Heat and Power (CHP), also called cogeneration, generates electricity and useful heat simultaneously from a single fuel source. While a conventional power plant converts only 30–40% of fuel energy to electricity (losing the rest as waste heat), a CHP system captures that waste heat for space heating, water heating, or industrial processes, achieving 70–90% overall efficiency.

The key metric is overall fuel utilization efficiency: the sum of useful electrical and thermal output divided by total fuel energy input. A CHP system producing 35% electrical efficiency and 45% thermal efficiency achieves 80% overall efficiency — more than double the useful energy from the same fuel compared to separate generation.

This calculator computes the overall efficiency of a CHP system from electrical output, thermal output, and fuel input. It helps engineers and facility managers evaluate cogeneration economics.

Quantifying this parameter enables systematic comparison across facilities, time periods, and equipment configurations, revealing optimization opportunities that reduce both costs and emissions.

When This Page Helps

CHP systems represent a major capital investment. This calculator quantifies the efficiency advantage over separate heat and power generation, essential for financial justification and regulatory compliance.

How to Use the Inputs

  1. Enter the electrical output of the CHP system in kW or kWh.
  2. Enter the useful thermal output in kW or kWh.
  3. Enter the total fuel input in kW or kWh (same units).
  4. Review the electrical efficiency, thermal efficiency, and overall efficiency.
Formula used
Electrical Efficiency = Electric Output / Fuel Input × 100 Thermal Efficiency = Thermal Output / Fuel Input × 100 Overall Efficiency = (Electric + Thermal) / Fuel Input × 100

Example Calculation

Result: 80.0% overall efficiency (35% electric, 45% thermal)

Electric efficiency = 350 / 1,000 = 35%. Thermal efficiency = 450 / 1,000 = 45%. Overall = (350 + 450) / 1,000 = 80%. Compared to separate generation (35% power plant + 85% boiler = ~51% combined), CHP provides 57% more useful energy from the same fuel.

Tips & Best Practices

  • Overall CHP efficiency of 70%+ is needed for most incentive programs.
  • Natural gas-fired CHP systems typically achieve 65–85% overall efficiency.
  • Fuel cells with heat recovery can reach 85–90% overall efficiency.
  • Size the CHP to thermal load, not electrical load, for maximum efficiency.
  • Waste heat temperature determines the quality and usefulness of thermal output.
  • CHP qualifies for EPA efficiency credits and many state incentive programs.

CHP Prime Mover Technologies

Reciprocating engines: most common for small-medium CHP, 30–42% electric efficiency. Gas turbines: suitable for larger installations, 25–40% electric, high-temperature exhaust heat. Steam turbines: industrial applications with boiler-generated steam. Fuel cells: highest electrical efficiency (40–60%), cleanest emissions, highest cost.

Sizing for Maximum Efficiency

The most efficient CHP operation matches electrical and thermal output to facility loads. Oversized systems waste heat; undersized systems leave potential savings unrealized. Size to base thermal load for consistent high-efficiency operation, with supplemental boilers for peak heating demand.

Economic Considerations

CHP payback depends on the spark spread (difference between electricity and gas prices), utilization hours, and incentives. Higher spark spreads and >6,000 annual operating hours typically yield payback in 3–7 years. Low gas prices and high electricity prices create the most favorable economics.

Sources & Methodology

Last updated:

Frequently Asked Questions

  • CHP generates electricity and captures the waste heat for useful purposes in a single, integrated system. It can use natural gas, biogas, biomass, or other fuels. By using heat that would otherwise be wasted, CHP achieves efficiencies of 70–90% compared to 45–55% for separate heat and power.