Calculate body surface area using Du Bois, Mosteller, Haycock, Gehan-George, and Boyd formulas. Compare BSA results across common clinical reference methods.
The Body Surface Area (BSA) Calculator estimates total body surface area using several established medical formulas. BSA is commonly used for body-size scaling in settings such as dose reporting, cardiac indexing, renal normalization, and burn-size estimation. Unlike body weight alone, it reflects both height and weight.
This calculator implements five widely used BSA formulas — Du Bois & Du Bois (1916), Mosteller (1987), Haycock (1978), Gehan & George (1970), and Boyd (1935) — so you can compare results across methods. Each formula uses slightly different exponents and coefficients, reflecting different study populations and methodologies. The page treats them as reference conventions rather than a universal truth, and the average across formulas is shown only as a comparison point.
Typical adult BSA values often fall around 1.5 to 2.2 m², but exact values vary with body habitus. The calculator is best used as a comparison across formulas rather than as a stand-alone treatment decision tool.
BSA is commonly used when clinicians normalize physiologic measurements or report medication doses per square meter. Showing several formulas side by side makes it easier to see whether the estimate is stable across methods before a clinician chooses the convention relevant to the task.
Du Bois (1916): BSA = 0.007184 × W^0.425 × H^0.725. Mosteller (1987): BSA = √(H × W / 3600). Haycock (1978): BSA = 0.024265 × W^0.5378 × H^0.3964. Gehan & George (1970): BSA = 0.0235 × W^0.51456 × H^0.42246. Boyd (1935): BSA = 0.0003207 × W^(0.7285 − 0.0188 × log10(W)) × H^0.3. Where W = weight in kg, H = height in cm, BSA in m².
Result: BSA ≈ 1.98 m² (Mosteller)
Using the Mosteller formula: BSA = √(178 × 80 / 3600) = √(14240 / 3600) = √3.956 = 1.989 m². The Du Bois formula gives a similar result: BSA = 0.007184 × 80^0.425 × 178^0.725 ≈ 1.978 m². Both values are close for this body size, which is why either formula is often acceptable when a protocol does not specify one.
Body surface area estimation dates back to 1879 when Meeh proposed the first formula relating surface area to body weight. The landmark Du Bois & Du Bois paper of 1916 established the methodology that most subsequent formulas would follow. Despite studying only 9 subjects, their formula proved remarkably durable and remained a common reference for decades. Later researchers including Boyd (1935), Gehan & George (1970), Haycock (1978), and Mosteller (1987) refined the approach using larger datasets and modern statistical methods.
BSA is used as a scaling factor in a number of medical applications. In oncology, some medication regimens are reported per square meter. In cardiology, cardiac index (cardiac output divided by BSA) normalizes heart function measurements across patients of different sizes. In nephrology, BSA is used to standardize glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to 1.73 m², the average adult BSA used in early reference studies.
While all five formulas produce similar results for average-sized adults, they can diverge for individuals at the extremes of body size. For obese patients, the Du Bois formula may underestimate BSA compared with more recent formulas. For children, the Haycock formula is often used because it was validated in pediatric populations. Mosteller remains a common adult reference because it is simple to calculate.
Pharmaceutical companies have historically used BSA as one way to scale drug doses from animal studies to human trials. The rationale is that BSA correlates with several physiological parameters better than body weight alone. Even so, BSA is only one sizing method, and many settings now rely on additional pharmacokinetic and therapeutic-monitoring data.
Last updated:
This page computes five standard BSA estimates from height and weight, converts units as needed, and shows the arithmetic mean only as a comparison value. The calculator is designed to compare common formula conventions, not to decide which formula is universally correct. When a protocol or institution specifies a BSA method, that convention should take precedence over the page average.
Body surface area (BSA) is the total area of the external surface of the human body, measured in square meters. It is used as a body-size scaling reference in settings such as dose reporting, cardiac index calculation, and burn assessment.
No single formula is universally best for all populations. The Mosteller formula is commonly used in adults because it is simple, the Haycock formula performs well across age ranges including children, and the Du Bois formula remains a historical reference. For many routine uses, the formulas agree fairly closely and the choice depends on local convention.
Different researchers derived BSA formulas from different study populations, using different measurement techniques, at different times. Du Bois (1916) studied only 9 subjects using a surface-coating method. Later researchers used larger and more diverse populations. Each formula reflects the specific regression analysis of its data set, leading to slightly different coefficients and exponents.
Oncologists multiply the BSA (in m²) by a standard dose per square meter to calculate the total drug dose for each patient. This approach adjusts for body size differences and aims to achieve consistent drug exposure across patients. However, BSA-based dosing is an approximation, and some newer protocols now rely more on pharmacokinetic-guided dosing.
Direct BSA measurement is extremely difficult and impractical for clinical use. Historical methods involved wrapping the body in paper or foil and measuring the area. Modern 3D body scanning can provide direct measurements, but formulas remain the standard clinical approach due to their simplicity and practical accuracy for many uses.
Yes. BMI (Body Mass Index) is a ratio of weight to height squared, used primarily to classify weight status. BSA is an estimate of actual body surface area in square meters, used for clinical dosing and physiological scaling. They measure different things: BMI is a screening tool for weight classification, while BSA is a clinical parameter for treatment calculations.
Average adult BSA is approximately 1.7 m² for women and 1.9 m² for men. Typical ranges often fall between about 1.5 and 2.2 m², depending on body size. Children and infants have proportionally larger BSA relative to their weight.
BSA changes with age primarily because body size changes. In children, BSA increases rapidly with growth. In adults, BSA remains relatively stable unless weight changes significantly. Elderly adults may experience slight decreases in BSA due to height loss from vertebral compression. The formulas themselves are age-independent — they use only height and weight.