Alvarado Score Calculator (MANTRELS)
Calculate the Alvarado (MANTRELS) score to assess appendicitis probability. Evaluates symptoms, signs, and lab values to stratify low, intermediate, and high risk.
Calculate the Modified Centor (McIsaac) score to review Group A strep likelihood context from symptoms and age.
| Score | Strep Probability | Common Worksheet Context |
|---|---|---|
| ≤0 | 1-2.5% | Low GAS context; testing is often deferred |
| 1 | 5-10% | Low GAS context; testing may still be deferred |
| 2 | 11-17% | Intermediate context; a test-based pathway is commonly used |
| 3 | 28-35% | Higher GAS context; local testing/treatment pathway still decides next steps |
| 4-5 | 51-53% | Highest worksheet context; use with the actual local pathway |
| Criterion | Points | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Tonsillar exudates | +1 | Typical of bacterial pharyngitis |
| Tender anterior cervical lymphadenopathy | +1 | Reactive lymph nodes from local infection |
| Fever ≥38°C | +1 | Suggestive of bacterial etiology |
| Absence of cough | +1 | Cough suggests viral URI rather than strep |
| Age 3-14 | +1 | Peak GAS pharyngitis age group |
| Age 15-44 | 0 | Intermediate risk |
| Age ≥45 | −1 | GAS pharyngitis uncommon in older adults |
The Modified Centor Score, also called the McIsaac Score, estimates how closely a sore-throat presentation matches the usual pattern of Group A streptococcal pharyngitis. It uses tonsillar exudates, tender anterior cervical nodes, fever, absence of cough, and age adjustment.
Scores range from -1 to 5. Lower totals point away from strep, while higher totals increase the likelihood that bacterial pharyngitis deserves closer review in the local testing context.
Use the Centor score when you want a structured sore-throat worksheet instead of relying on guesswork. It helps separate presentations that look more viral from presentations that fit the classic GAS pattern more closely.
The score is most useful when it is combined with exam findings, local testing rules, and the patient's overall presentation rather than treated as a stand-alone antibiotic rule.
Modified Centor Score = Tonsillar exudates (0-1) + Tender anterior cervical lymphadenopathy (0-1) + Fever ≥38°C (0-1) + Absence of cough (0-1) + Age adjustment (−1 to +1)
Age: 3-14 years → +1; 15-44 years → 0; ≥45 years → −1
Total Range: −1 to 5Result: Score 4 — higher GAS-likelihood context
Tonsillar exudates (+1) + lymphadenopathy (+1) + fever (+1) + no cough (+1) + age 15-44 (0) = 4. That pattern fits the classic GAS presentation more strongly than a low score would, but the page should still be read alongside testing access, exam findings, and local guidance.
Most sore throats are not caused by Group A strep, so a structured score can help keep the exam organized. The Centor framework highlights the features that push the presentation toward a more classic GAS pattern.
A high score does not prove bacterial disease, and a low score does not replace the rest of the clinical picture. Viral infections, age, community prevalence, and local testing access all affect how the result is used.
The page works best as a sore-throat worksheet and pre-test likelihood aid. It should not be treated as a stand-alone antibiotic or testing order set.
Last updated:
This calculator applies the Modified Centor / McIsaac rule by assigning points for tonsillar exudates, tender anterior cervical nodes, fever, absence of cough, and age category, then summing the result into the standard -1 to 5 total. The output is presented as a pre-test probability aid for deciding when rapid antigen testing, throat culture, or empiric treatment pathways may be considered.
The page is not a stand-alone antibiotic decision. Viral syndromes, local testing practice, pediatric culture-confirmation rules, and antimicrobial-stewardship guidance still matter, and the score should be used alongside examination and testing strategy rather than instead of them.
The original Centor criteria had 4 clinical components. McIsaac added age adjustment to improve discrimination across age groups.
No. A higher score raises suspicion, but the page is most useful as pre-test likelihood context rather than as a stand-alone diagnostic rule.
EBV, adenovirus, and other viral infections can still produce a higher score. That is one reason the total should not be treated as a stand-alone antibiotic decision.
It was designed for acute sore-throat presentations. Recurrent symptoms usually need broader clinical context than repeated scoring alone.
Calculate the Alvarado (MANTRELS) score to assess appendicitis probability. Evaluates symptoms, signs, and lab values to stratify low, intermediate, and high risk.
Calculate the Wells Score for pulmonary embolism probability. Summarizes the standard 7 criteria into low, moderate, or high pretest-probability bands.
Review the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) and see whether all eight bedside criteria are absent in a low-risk worksheet setting.