Fetal Weight Percentile Calculator

Estimate fetal weight using the Hadlock formula from ultrasound biometry. Shows EFW plus an approximate gestational-age percentile reference.

⚠️ Medical Disclaimer: Estimated fetal weight has ±10-15% measurement error, and this page uses an approximate percentile reference rather than a full obstetric growth-standard implementation. Clinical decisions should integrate ultrasound findings, growth velocity, Doppler studies, and maternal factors. Consult your OB provider.
wk
days
mm
mm
mm
mm
Estimated Fetal Weight
1,740 g
3.8 lbs
56th percentile
Appropriate for Gestational Age (AGA)
3rd10th50th90th
Estimated Fetal Weight
1,740 g
3.84 lbs (Hadlock formula)
Weight Percentile
56th
Appropriate for Gestational Age (AGA) — approximate reference percentile
Z-Score
0.16
Standard deviations from median
Expected Median
1,700 g
50th %ile at 32.0 weeks
Weight vs Median
+40 g
102% of median
Classification
Appropriate for Gestational Age (AGA)
Normal range
CategoryPercentileClinical Significance
Severe FGR<3rdHigh risk for adverse outcomes — intensive surveillance
SGA3rd-9thGrowth restriction — serial ultrasound, Doppler monitoring
AGA10th-90thAppropriate growth — routine care
LGA>90thScreen for gestational diabetes, macrosomia risk
GA (weeks)10th %ile (g)50th %ile (g)90th %ile (g)
24483690897
288051,1501,495
321,1901,7002,210
341,4702,1002,730
361,8202,6003,380
382,1353,0503,965
402,3803,4004,420
Planning notes, formulas, and examples

About the Fetal Weight Percentile Calculator

The Fetal Weight Percentile Calculator estimates fetal weight from standard ultrasound biometry using the Hadlock formula. It combines biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length, then compares the result with a gestational-age reference range.

That gives you an estimated fetal weight, an approximate percentile, and a basic classification such as small for gestational age, appropriate for gestational age, or large for gestational age. The percentile view is useful because it puts a single weight estimate into the context of expected growth at the same gestational age.

The page is aimed at quick growth screening, not at replacing a full obstetric assessment or serial trend review.

When This Page Helps

Percentile-based fetal weight estimates help make growth assessment easier to compare across visits and across pregnancies. They are most useful as a screening view that points to possible concern and suggests when closer follow-up or a more complete assessment may be worth considering.

How to Use the Inputs

  1. Enter the current gestational age in weeks and days.
  2. Enter the BPD measurement from ultrasound in millimeters.
  3. Enter the head circumference (HC) in millimeters.
  4. Enter the abdominal circumference (AC) in millimeters.
  5. Enter the femur length (FL) in millimeters.
  6. Review the estimated fetal weight, percentile, and classification.
  7. For SGA or LGA fetuses, discuss surveillance and management plans.
Formula used
Hadlock EFW: log₁₀(EFW) = 1.3596 + 0.0064×HC + 0.0424×AC + 0.174×FL + 0.00061×BPD×AC − 0.00386×AC×FL (All biometry in cm; EFW in grams) SGA: <10th percentile AGA: 10th-90th percentile LGA: >90th percentile Severe FGR: <3rd percentile

Example Calculation

Result: EFW ~1800g — 55th percentile (AGA)

With biometry measurements at 32 weeks producing an EFW of approximately 1800g, the fetus is at the 55th percentile — appropriate for gestational age with normal growth velocity.

Tips & Best Practices

  • AC is the most important single parameter — if only one measurement is available, use AC-based formulas.
  • Ensure measurements are obtained according to standardized technique (plane, calipers, averages).
  • Growth velocity (interval change) is often more informative than a single percentile.
  • Consider Doppler assessment (umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery) for EFW <10th percentile.
  • Report uncertainty: an EFW of 2000g means the true weight is likely 1700-2300g.
  • Oligohydramnios (AFI <5) alongside SGA significantly increases the concern for true FGR.

Hadlock Formula Variants

Multiple Hadlock equations exist using different parameter combinations. The 4-parameter formula (BPD, HC, AC, FL) provides the best overall accuracy. When BPD is unreliable (dolichocephaly, engaged head), the 3-parameter HC+AC+FL formula is preferred. Select the appropriate formula based on measurement quality and fetal position.

Fetal Growth Restriction Management

Early-onset FGR (<32 weeks) is often associated with placental insufficiency and abnormal uterine artery Doppler waveforms. Management includes serial ultrasound, Doppler surveillance (umbilical artery, MCA, ductus venosus), and timed delivery. Late-onset FGR (≥32 weeks) may have normal Dopplers and requires cerebro-placental ratio (CPR) assessment for detection.

Emerging Technology

AI-assisted ultrasound biometry is showing promise for reducing inter-operator variability. Magnetic resonance imaging provides more accurate fetal weight estimation in obese patients and at the extremes of fetal weight but is not widely available for routine prenatal care.

Sources & Methodology

Last updated:

Methodology

This page uses a two-step estimate: it first calculates estimated fetal weight from Hadlock biometry, then places that estimate against a simplified gestational-age reference curve to generate an approximate percentile and SGA/AGA/LGA band. It is intended as a quick screening summary rather than a formal fetal-growth-standard implementation.

Because the percentile layer is approximate, borderline results should not be treated as interchangeable with a published Hadlock, INTERGROWTH, or customized growth chart. Serial growth trend, Doppler findings, fluid status, and the obstetric service's chosen fetal-growth standard remain more important than any one point estimate.

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

  • The Hadlock formula has a systematic error of ±10-15% (95% CI). Accuracy decreases at extremes — very small and very large fetuses have greater prediction error. Adjacent measurements (e.g., 1800g ± 250g) represent a clinically significant range. Serial growth trend assessment is more informative than a single EFW.