SOFA Score Calculator
Calculate the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score across six organ systems and review mortality-oriented severity context.
Calculate the quick SOFA (qSOFA) score for bedside infection-risk assessment. Uses 3 simple criteria to flag patients with suspected infection who may need broader reassessment.
| qSOFA | Risk | Mortality | Typical Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Low | <3% | Lower bedside concern; continue routine reassessment if infection remains possible |
| 1 | Intermediate | ~10% | Intermediate concern; reassessment and escalation decisions depend on the broader picture |
| 2-3 | High | 24%+ | High bedside concern; fuller organ-dysfunction review and local sepsis pathway are commonly considered |
| Concept | qSOFA | SOFA | SIRS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Bedside screen | Organ dysfunction | Inflammatory response |
| Criteria | 3 (SBP, RR, GCS) | 6 organ systems | 4 (Temp, HR, RR, WBC) |
| Lab needed | No | Yes (extensive) | Yes (WBC) |
| Threshold | ≥2 = positive | ≥2 = organ dysfunction | ≥2 = SIRS present |
| Best for | ED triage, floor | ICU, sepsis diagnosis | Historical (retired) |
The quick SOFA (qSOFA) score is a bedside clinical tool introduced in the modern sepsis consensus framework to flag patients with suspected infection who are at increased risk for poor outcomes. Using only three criteria — systolic blood pressure ≤100 mmHg, respiratory rate ≥22, and Glasgow Coma Scale <15 — it requires no laboratory testing and can be assessed in seconds.
qSOFA ≥2 is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared with qSOFA <2. The score is best used as a prompt for fuller reassessment, including whether organ dysfunction may be present and whether local escalation pathways should be reviewed. Importantly, qSOFA is a screening tool, not a diagnostic criterion for sepsis — the consensus definition still requires documented organ dysfunction (SOFA increase ≥2) in the setting of infection.
The simplicity of qSOFA makes it useful for initial triage in emergency departments, hospital floors, and resource-limited settings where laboratory results may not be immediately available.
The prior SIRS criteria (temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, white blood cell count) were highly sensitive but often nonspecific. qSOFA is narrower and is mainly used to highlight a higher-risk bedside picture rather than to diagnose sepsis on its own.
As a no-lab bedside tool, qSOFA can help structure early reassessment before additional results return, especially when the clinical question is whether the patient may need closer observation or broader sepsis workup.
qSOFA Score = Sum of:
SBP ≤100 mmHg: 1 point
RR ≥22/min: 1 point
GCS <15: 1 point
Range: 0-3
0: Lower bedside risk signal (<3% mortality)
1: Intermediate bedside risk signal (~10% mortality)
≥2: Higher bedside risk signal (24%+ mortality) — review for possible organ dysfunctionResult: qSOFA 3/3 — High Risk
All three criteria are present: SBP 90 (≤100), RR 24 (≥22), and GCS 14 (<15). That places the patient in the highest qSOFA band and should prompt broader review for organ dysfunction and escalation using the local sepsis pathway.
Modern sepsis consensus statements define sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. That moved bedside thinking away from the older SIRS-only framing. In practical terms, qSOFA works best as a quick bedside flag that can prompt fuller SOFA-based reassessment.
qSOFA can be calculated immediately, before laboratory data return, and helps structure early bedside concern when infection is on the differential. It is not a treatment algorithm, but it can help frame which patients may need closer observation, broader workup, or escalation discussions.
qSOFA has been criticized for lower sensitivity than SIRS for identifying sepsis, for not incorporating temperature or white count, and for variable performance across validation cohorts. Many clinicians therefore use it as one tool among several rather than as a standalone gatekeeper.
Last updated:
This calculator assigns one point each for systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or less, respiratory rate of 22 per minute or greater, and altered mentation, then sums the total into the standard 0-3 qSOFA score. The result is presented as a bedside prompt for further sepsis evaluation, especially the need to assess organ dysfunction with the full SOFA framework and to escalate infection management when clinically indicated.
The page does not treat qSOFA as a diagnosis of sepsis. A score below 2 does not exclude sepsis, and a score of 2 or more is meant to highlight increased risk of poor outcome in patients with suspected infection rather than to replace broader clinical assessment or hospital protocols.
qSOFA replaces SIRS as a bedside screening tool, but neither qSOFA nor SIRS are diagnostic. The modern sepsis definition still requires suspected or confirmed infection plus acute organ dysfunction measured by a SOFA increase of at least 2. qSOFA identifies patients who should be evaluated for that organ dysfunction.
Yes. qSOFA has moderate sensitivity (~60-70%) but high specificity for predicting poor outcomes. A qSOFA <2 does NOT rule out sepsis — patients with suspected infection and qSOFA <2 may still have sepsis and should continue to be monitored. qSOFA is better at predicting mortality than at diagnosing sepsis.
Early sepsis bundles group common frontline steps such as lactate measurement, blood cultures before antibiotics, early antimicrobials, and fluid resuscitation for shock states. This calculator mentions that workflow only as background context; bedside management still depends on the full clinical picture and local protocols.
qSOFA uses 3 criteria without labs and was designed specifically for infection. NEWS (National Early Warning Score) and MEWS use 6-7 vital sign parameters and are designed for general clinical deterioration, not specifically sepsis. Some studies suggest NEWS may outperform qSOFA for sepsis screening on general wards because it uses more parameters.
qSOFA was validated primarily for patients outside the ICU (ED, floor, outpatient). In the ICU, the full SOFA score should be used because ICU patients often meet qSOFA criteria from baseline critical illness. Consensus guidance treats qSOFA mainly as a non-ICU bedside screen.
Serum lactate ≥2 mmol/L is an important marker of tissue hypoperfusion in sepsis. However, lactate requires a blood draw and processing time. qSOFA is complementary — it provides immediate bedside assessment while lactate results are pending. Elevated lactate with qSOFA ≥2 identifies the highest-risk patients.
Calculate the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score across six organ systems and review mortality-oriented severity context.
Calculate the APACHE II score to estimate ICU mortality risk. Uses acute physiology, age, and chronic health status to predict in-hospital death probability.
Calculate the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) for inpatient deterioration detection and place the result in common ward-monitoring context bands.