Calculate corrected sodium for hyperglycemia using Katz (1.6) and Hillier (2.4) correction factors. Essential for DKA and HHS sodium assessment.
In hyperglycemic states such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS), the measured serum sodium is often lowered by osmotic water shifts. Elevated glucose pulls water from the intracellular to the extracellular space, diluting the measured sodium. The corrected sodium formula estimates what the sodium would look like if the glucose-related water shift were removed.
Two correction factors are in common use: the classic Katz factor of 1.6 mEq/L per 100 mg/dL glucose above normal, and the Hillier factor of 2.4 mEq/L per 100 mg/dL, which may fit better at higher glucose levels. This calculator presents both values side by side so the user can see the range rather than treating one estimate as the only answer.
Getting the corrected sodium right matters because it changes how the measured sodium should be interpreted during DKA/HHS review. The page is strongest as a context aid: it helps separate dilutional hyponatremia from a true sodium problem, but it should not be mistaken for a stand-alone fluid-order tool.
Corrected sodium helps separate dilutional hyponatremia from the patient's likely true sodium status when glucose is very high. This calculator keeps the measured sodium, glucose level, and the two common correction factors together so the interpretation does not hinge on the raw sodium alone.
Corrected Na⁺ = Measured Na⁺ + (Correction Factor × (Glucose − 100) / 100). Katz factor = 1.6 mEq/L per 100 mg/dL. Hillier factor = 2.4 mEq/L per 100 mg/dL. Normal reference glucose = 100 mg/dL.
Result: Corrected Na⁺ = 134.4 mEq/L (Katz); 137.6 mEq/L (Hillier)
Glucose excess = 500 − 100 = 400. Katz: 128 + (1.6 × 4) = 134.4. Hillier: 128 + (2.4 × 4) = 137.6. The measured Na of 128 is therefore partly dilutional from hyperglycemia, and the corrected sodium sits much closer to normal than the raw sodium suggests.
The original correction factor of 1.6 mEq/L per 100 mg/dL was derived by Katz in 1973 from osmotic principles and limited clinical data. In 1999, Hillier et al. used patient data from hyperglycemic episodes and found that a factor of 2.4 fit better at higher glucose levels. Neither factor is exact — the true relationship is non-linear — which is why showing both estimates is often more honest than overcommitting to one number.
Corrected sodium matters because hyperglycemia can make a patient look more hyponatremic than they really are. In DKA and HHS, that changes how the measured sodium should be interpreted during ongoing fluid and insulin management. The page is not prescribing a fluid sequence; it is helping the user understand what part of the sodium abnormality is likely driven by glucose.
The correction factor assumes no concurrent sodium disorder. Patients with SIADH and DKA simultaneously, or those on thiazides with DKA, may have both dilutional and true hyponatremia — the corrected sodium will still underestimate the true deficit. Additionally, in HHS with extreme glucose (>1,000), the correction oversimplifies the osmotic relationship. In these cases, serum osmolality measurement and the osmol gap provide additional clinical clarity.
Last updated:
This worksheet applies the two most commonly cited glucose-correction factors to the measured sodium so users can compare a classic estimate with a higher-glucose estimate. It is a context aid for hyperglycemic states, not a stand-alone fluid prescription.
Glucose is an effective osmole that cannot freely cross cell membranes. When blood glucose is high, water moves from intracellular to extracellular space by osmosis, diluting sodium in the process. This is a translocation hyponatremia — total body sodium may be normal or even high.
The Katz factor (1.6) was derived from more moderate hyperglycemia, while Hillier et al. suggested that the relationship steepens at higher glucose levels. In practice, many teams look at both, especially when glucose is well above 400 mg/dL.
A high corrected sodium suggests that the patient may have a meaningful free-water deficit underneath the hyperglycemia. That is useful context because the measured sodium can look deceptively low while the corrected sodium points in the opposite direction.
No. Hyperglycemic hyponatremia is a real redistribution of water (true change in sodium concentration). Lipemic or paraproteinemic pseudohyponatremia is a lab artifact — the sodium is normal by direct ISE measurement. The glucose correction addresses a physiological shift, not a lab error.
It helps clarify whether the measured sodium is mainly a glucose-driven dilutional effect or whether there is also a true sodium deficit or free-water deficit underneath. That context is one reason corrected sodium is often reviewed alongside the rest of the DKA/HHS picture.
Yes — mannitol, sorbitol, and glycerol are effective osmoles that pull water into the extracellular space, lowering sodium. However, BUN and ethanol freely cross membranes and do NOT cause osmotic water shifts, so they are "ineffective osmoles" that don't affect sodium.