Vertical Jump Power Calculator

Calculate peak power output from your vertical jump using Lewis, Sayers, and Harman formulas. Compare results across methods and see sport-specific percentile rankings.

Avg Peak Power
4,325 W
Power/Weight
53.0 W/kg
Jump: Very GoodPower: Above Average

Peak Power by Formula

Sayers (CMJ)✓ Recommended5,961 W
Most validated
Harman Peak5,520 W
Force plate regression
Lewis (Nomogram)1,495 W
Classic formula
Sayers Peak Power
5,961 W
Most accurate (CMJ)
Harman Peak Power
5,520 W
Lewis Peak Power
1,495 W
Harman Avg Power
1,993 W
Mean propulsive power
Power/Weight
53.0 W/kg
Above Average
Jump Height
28.0″ / 71.1 cm
Very Good

Sport Benchmarks (Male)

Sport / LevelJump (in)Power (W/kg)
NBA (avg combine)34–3665–75
NFL (avg combine)32–3560–70
Volleyball (D1 male)28–3455–65
Soccer (professional)22–2845–58
CrossFit (competitive)26–3250–60
Recreational athlete18–2435–50
Untrained adult male14–2025–40
⚠️ Disclaimer: Power estimates from regression equations are approximations. For precise measurements, use force plate or linear position transducer testing. These formulas were validated on adult athletic populations and may be less accurate for youth, elderly, or non-athletic individuals.
Planning notes, formulas, and examples

About the Vertical Jump Power Calculator

The vertical jump is one of the most widely used tests of lower-body explosive power in sport science. By combining your jump height with body weight, established formulas can estimate your peak power output in watts—a key metric that correlates with sprint speed, change-of-direction ability, and overall athletic performance.

Our Vertical Jump Power Calculator uses three validated formulas—Lewis (Nomogram), Sayers, and Harman—to estimate your peak and average power output. Each formula was developed from research on different athletic populations and produces slightly different results. Comparing all three gives you a more complete picture of your explosive capabilities.

Whether you're an athlete tracking training progress, a coach evaluating players, or a sports science student learning about power assessment, it shows instant, research-backed power estimates from a simple vertical jump test.

When This Page Helps

Peak power is one of the best predictors of sport performance in activities requiring explosive movement—jumping, sprinting, tackling, and throwing. Lab-based power testing (force plates, linear position transducers) is expensive and requires specialized equipment. The vertical jump is a free, accessible field test that, combined with validated regression equations, provides a reliable estimate of peak power output for athlete screening and progress tracking.

How to Use the Inputs

  1. Enter your body weight in pounds or kilograms.
  2. Enter your vertical jump height in inches or centimeters.
  3. View peak power estimates from Lewis, Sayers, and Harman formulas.
  4. Compare the three estimates to see the range of your power output.
  5. Check your power-to-weight ratio (watts per kg).
  6. Review sport-specific percentile rankings.
  7. Track your jump height over time to monitor training progress.
Formula used
Lewis Formula: Peak Power (W) = √4.9 × Body Mass (kg) × √Jump Height (m) × 9.81. Sayers Formula (CMJ): Peak Power (W) = 60.7 × Jump Height (cm) + 45.3 × Body Mass (kg) − 2055. Harman Formula: Peak Power (W) = 61.9 × Jump Height (cm) + 36.0 × Body Mass (kg) − 1822. Harman Average Power (W) = 21.2 × Jump Height (cm) + 23.0 × Body Mass (kg) − 1393.

Example Calculation

Result: Lewis: 4,627 W; Sayers: 5,267 W; Harman: 5,192 W; Average Power: 2,067 W

A 180-lb (81.6 kg) athlete with a 28-inch (71.1 cm) vertical jump generates an estimated peak power ranging from 4,627 W (Lewis) to 5,267 W (Sayers). The Sayers formula is generally considered most accurate for countermovement jumps. Power-to-weight ratio is approximately 64.5 W/kg, which is above average for recreational athletes.

Tips & Best Practices

  • Always warm up thoroughly before testing vertical jump—cold muscles reduce jump height.
  • Use the countermovement jump (CMJ) for the Sayers formula—dip and explode upward.
  • Test at the same time of day and under the same conditions for consistent tracking.
  • Take 3–5 attempts with full rest between jumps and record the best effort.
  • Power-to-weight ratio (W/kg) is more useful than absolute power for comparing athletes of different sizes.
  • Vertical jump improvements of 1–2 inches indicate meaningful power gains.
  • Plyometric and Olympic lifting training are the most effective ways to increase jump power.

The Science of Vertical Jump Testing

The vertical jump test has been a staple of athletic assessment since the 1920s. It measures the neuromuscular system's ability to produce force rapidly—a quality known as explosive power or rate of force development. Research consistently shows that vertical jump performance correlates with sprint speed, change of direction, and sport-specific performance across dozens of sports.

Formula Comparisons

The Lewis formula (also called the Nomogram) was one of the earliest equations and uses a square root relationship. It tends to underestimate true peak power compared to force plate measurements. The Sayers equation (1999) was developed from countermovement jump data and correlates most highly with force plate peak power (r = 0.88). The Harman formula (1991) provides both peak and average power estimates and performs similarly to Sayers for peak power.

Practical Applications

Track vertical jump height and estimated power monthly to monitor training adaptations. Improvements in jump power often precede improvements in sprint times and sport performance. If jump power stagnates despite training, it may indicate overtraining, inadequate recovery, or the need to change programming emphasis.

Sources & Methodology

Last updated:

Methodology

This worksheet applies published jump-height and power relationships to estimate Vertical Jump Power Calculator. It is useful for comparison and benchmarking, but the output depends on technique, measurement method, and whether the athlete is testing fresh.

Sources

  • ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (American College of Sports Medicine) — General exercise-testing reference for field estimates and thresholds.
  • NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (National Strength and Conditioning Association) — Training-load, speed, jump, and periodization planning reference.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • The Sayers formula is generally considered the most accurate for countermovement jump (CMJ) peak power, as it was validated against force plate measurements across a wide range of athletes. The Lewis formula tends to underestimate peak power, while the Harman formula provides similar results to Sayers. Using all three gives you a reliable range.