Quartic Regression Calculator

Fit a fourth-degree polynomial (Y=aX⁴+bX³+cX²+dX+e) with R², critical points, inflection points, ANOVA, residuals, and degree comparison.

Quartic Regression Calculator

Comma-separated, minimum 6 points
Comma-separated
Equation
Y = 0.7669X⁴ + 0.0000X³ + 0.9767X² + 0.0000X + -11.7296
Fourth-degree polynomial fit
0.999604
99.96% of variance explained
Adjusted R²
0.999208
Penalized for 5 parameters (n=9)
Std. Error
2.4428
√(SSRes / (n−5)) = √(23.87 / 4)
F-statistic
2,523.10
(SSReg/4) / (SSRes/(n−5))
End Behavior
Both ends → +∞ (W-shape or U-shape)
Leading coefficient a = 0.766900
Predicted Y(5)
492.0000
Quartic model prediction
Data Points
9
4 residual DoF

Coefficients

TermCoefficientMagnitude
X⁴0.76689977
0.00000000
0.97668998
X0.00000000
constant-11.72960373

Curve Features

FeatureX value(s)Y value(s)Type
Critical point 10.0000-11.7296Local minimum

Residuals

XY (obs)PredictedResidual|Residual|
-4.00200.0000200.2238-0.2238
-3.0060.000059.17950.8205
-2.004.00004.4476-0.4476
-1.00-12.0000-9.9860-2.0140
0.00-8.0000-11.72963.7296
1.00-12.0000-9.9860-2.0140
2.004.00004.4476-0.4476
3.0060.000059.17950.8205
4.00200.0000200.2238-0.2238

Degree Comparison

DegreeNameAdj. R²Improvement
1Linear0.000000-0.142857
2Quadratic0.9421710.922895
3Cubic0.9421710.907474
4Quartic0.9996040.999208

ANOVA Summary

SourceSSdfMSF
Regression60,225.0194415,056.25492,523.10
Residual23.869545.9674
Total60,248.88898
Planning notes, formulas, and examples

About the Quartic Regression Calculator

Quartic (fourth-degree) polynomials can model data with up to three turning points: double-well shapes (W-curves), revenue-cost models with two peaks, and dampened oscillations. Enter at least six data points, and this calculator fits Y = aX⁴ + bX³ + cX² + dX + e using least squares via a 5×5 normal equation system.

Beyond the equation and fit statistics, the calculator identifies critical points (local minima/maxima) from the first derivative and inflection points from the second derivative. End behavior is determined by the sign of the leading coefficient: positive a means both tails rise to infinity, producing W-shapes or U-shapes; negative a means both tails fall, producing M-shapes.

The degree comparison table shows R² and adjusted R² for linear through quartic fits, helping you determine whether the quartic's extra complexity is justified. A full ANOVA table decomposes variance into regression and residual components.

When This Page Helps

When cubic regression doesn't capture your data's shape — especially if there are three turning points or symmetric double-well patterns — quartic is the next step. Common in physics (potential energy surfaces), materials science (stress-strain with hysteresis), and economics (cost curves with multiple equilibria).

The curve features table (critical points, inflection points, end behavior) translates raw coefficients into interpretable geometric properties. This matters because quartic coefficients are unintuitive — but "local minimum at X = 1.22 with Y = −9.25" is immediately useful.

How to Use the Inputs

  1. Enter X values and Y values as comma-separated numbers (minimum 6 points).
  2. Load a preset for common quartic patterns.
  3. Review the quartic equation and R².
  4. Check the coefficients table for relative magnitudes.
  5. Examine the curve features table for critical and inflection points.
  6. Compare degree 1-4 fits — is quartic actually needed?
  7. Enter an X value for point prediction.
Formula used
Y = aX⁴ + bX³ + cX² + dX + e (5 coefficients, 5×5 normal equations). Critical points: 4aX³ + 3bX² + 2cX + d = 0. Inflection points: 12aX² + 6bX + 2c = 0.

Example Calculation

Result: Y ≈ 1.0X⁴ + 0.0X³ − 3.0X² + 0.0X − 8.0, R² ≈ 1.000, two local minima, one local maximum

The symmetric W-shaped data is perfectly captured by Y = X⁴ − 3X² − 8. The quartic has two minima (around X = ±1.22) and a local maximum at X = 0, forming the classic double-well potential.

Tips & Best Practices

  • If adjusted R² doesn't improve over cubic, stick with cubic — simpler is better.
  • The double-well preset is the canonical quartic shape — compare your data to it.
  • Leading coefficient sign determines shape: a > 0 → W, a < 0 → M.
  • Quartics are poor for extrapolation — X⁴ grows extremely fast outside the data range.
  • Use ≥ 10 data points for reliable 5-coefficient estimation.
  • Check residual bars: systematic patterns mean a different model family (not polynomial) may be needed.

The 5×5 Normal Equations

Quartic regression requires solving a system of 5 equations in 5 unknowns, built from power sums S₀ through S₈ of the X values. The coefficient matrix has Vandermonde structure, which becomes increasingly ill-conditioned as the X range grows. The calculator uses Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting for numerical stability.

Quartic Models in Science

In quantum mechanics, the quartic potential V(x) = ax⁴ − bx² models systems with two stable states (double-well). In materials science, stress-strain curves for shape-memory alloys exhibit quartic characteristics. In epidemiology, infection curves can show quartic patterns during multi-wave outbreaks. The key diagnostic: if your data has three direction changes, quartic may be appropriate.

Beyond Quartic: When to Stop

Higher-degree polynomials (quintic, sextic) rarely add genuine explanatory power. The adjusted R² and AIC metrics quantify this: each additional parameter must reduce error enough to justify the complexity penalty. In practice, if quartic doesn't fit well, the relationship is probably not polynomial at all — consider splines, exponentials, logarithms, or domain-specific theoretical models.

Sources & Methodology

Last updated:

Frequently Asked Questions

  • When your data has three turning points (two peaks and one valley, or two valleys and one peak). If it has only one turning point, quadratic is sufficient; two turning points → cubic. Only escalate to quartic if lower degrees leave systematic residual patterns.