ATS Cost Calculator
Calculate annual applicant tracking system costs including per-user licenses, per-requisition fees, and integration expenses. Budget your ATS investment.
Calculate quality of hire by averaging performance ratings, ramp-up time, hiring manager satisfaction, and first-year retention into a single score.
| Indicator | Score | Weight | Weighted Score | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 85 | 3 | 19.6 | |
| Ramp-Up Speed | 75 | 2 | 11.5 | |
| Manager Satisfaction | 90 | 2 | 13.8 | |
| Retention | 100 | 3 | 23.1 | |
| Engagement | 80 | 2 | 12.3 | |
| Culture Fit | 78 | 1 | 6 |
| Grade | Score Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| A | 90 - 100 | Exceptional hire - top performer and strong fit |
| B | 80 - 89 | Good hire - meets or exceeds expectations |
| C | 70 - 79 | Adequate hire - meets minimum standards |
| D | 60 - 69 | Below average - needs development plan |
| F | Below 60 | Poor hire - review hiring process for gaps |
Quality of hire (QoH) is widely regarded as the most important recruiting metric, yet it's also one of the hardest to measure. QoH quantifies how well new hires perform and contribute by combining multiple post-hire indicators into a single composite score, typically expressed as a percentage.
Common indicators include new hire performance ratings, time to full productivity (ramp-up), hiring manager satisfaction scores, and first-year retention. By averaging these indicators and normalizing to a 100-point scale, you create a holistic view of whether your recruiting process is bringing in people who thrive.
This Quality of Hire Calculator lets you input scores for up to four key indicators on a 0โ100 scale, then computes the average QoH score. Use it to compare quality across sources, recruiters, departments, and time periods to continuously improve your hiring outcomes.
Hiring faster or cheaper means nothing if the people you bring in don't perform well. QoH connects recruiting inputs to business outcomes, helping you optimize for the metric that matters most: the value new hires create for your organization.
Quality of Hire = (Performance Score + Ramp Score + Satisfaction Score + Retention Score) รท Number of IndicatorsResult: 87.5% QoH
Averaging the four indicators: (85 + 75 + 90 + 100) รท 4 = 87.5%. This indicates a high-quality hire who is performing well, ramped up reasonably quickly, and has a very satisfied hiring manager.
Start by identifying 3โ4 measurable indicators that your organization can consistently track. Establish a measurement timeline (90-day, 180-day, 365-day). Create a simple scoring rubric so ratings are comparable across teams. Pilot the program with a few departments before rolling out company-wide.
The real power of QoH emerges when you correlate it with recruiting variables. Which sourcing channels produce the highest QoH? Which interviewers are best at predicting success? Which job descriptions attract candidates who thrive? These correlations turn QoH from a report card into a strategic optimization tool.
Most organizations target a QoH above 80%. World-class talent acquisition teams achieve 85โ90%. If your QoH is below 70%, there are likely systemic issues with candidate assessment, job-role alignment, or onboarding effectiveness that need attention.
Last updated:
QoH depends on post-hire data that takes months to collect (performance reviews, retention). It also requires standardized performance ratings across the organization and consistent definitions of ramp-up milestones. Many companies lack these foundational measurement systems.
The most common indicators are job performance rating, time to productivity, hiring manager satisfaction, and first-year retention. Some organizations also include cultural fit assessments, engagement survey scores, and promotion velocity.
Equal weighting is the simplest approach. However, if job performance is your primary concern, you might weight it at 40% with the remaining three at 20% each. Align weights with your organization's strategic priorities.
Measure at 90 days for early signals, 6 months for mid-term assessment, and 12 months for Complete View. Annual QoH reviews support long-term recruiting strategy optimization.
Absolutely. A QoH of 85% in sales (where performance is easily quantified) may reflect different underlying quality than 85% in creative teams (where performance is more subjective). Compare within role families for the most meaningful insights.
By linking recruiting inputs (source, recruiter, interview process) to QoH outputs, you can identify which practices produce the best employees. This feedback loop transforms recruiting from a volume game to a quality-driven function.
Use proxy indicators like hiring manager satisfaction surveys, 90-day check-in feedback, or goal completion rates. Even informal assessments provide directional QoH data that's better than having no quality measurement at all.
Calculate annual applicant tracking system costs including per-user licenses, per-requisition fees, and integration expenses. Budget your ATS investment.
Calculate your cost per hire by dividing total internal and external recruiting costs by the number of hires. Benchmark CPH and optimize budgets.
Calculate the incremental cost of diversity hiring initiatives including diverse sourcing, events, ERG support, training, and specialized recruiting efforts.