ATS Cost Calculator
Calculate annual applicant tracking system costs including per-user licenses, per-requisition fees, and integration expenses. Budget your ATS investment.
Calculate video interviewing platform costs including license fees and per-interview charges. Compare against travel costs for in-person interviews.
| Quarter | Interviews | Est. Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 (Jan-Mar) | 240 | $3,120.00 |
| Q2 (Apr-Jun) | 360 | $4,680.00 |
| Q3 (Jul-Sep) | 360 | $4,680.00 |
| Q4 (Oct-Dec) | 240 | $3,120.00 |
| Annual Total | 1,200 | $15,600.00 |
Video interviewing platforms have become essential recruiting tools, enabling both live and asynchronous (one-way) interviews that reduce scheduling friction and travel costs compared to in-person meetings. Platforms like HireVue, Spark Hire, VidCruiter, and myInterview offer features ranging from basic video calls to AI-powered assessments.
Video interview platform costs typically include annual license fees ($3,000–$50,000+ depending on features and users) and sometimes per-interview charges ($5–$25 for one-way interviews). The key financial benefit is eliminating or reducing candidate travel costs, which can run $500–$2,000+ per in-person interview for out-of-area candidates.
This Video Interview Cost Calculator estimates your platform costs and the travel savings generated by replacing in-person interviews with video. Use it to build a business case for video interviewing technology or evaluate your current platform's ROI.
Video interviewing can save thousands in travel costs annually, but only if the platform costs less than the travel it replaces. This calculator compares the two to show your net savings and prove the ROI of your video interviewing investment.
Annual Platform Cost = License + (Per-Interview × Interviews); Travel Savings = Interviews Replacing Travel × Avg Travel Cost; Net Savings = Travel Savings − Platform CostResult: $230,500 net savings
Platform cost: $8,000 + ($5 × 500) = $10,500. Interviews replacing travel: 500 × 60% = 300. Travel savings: 300 × $800 = $240,000. Net savings: $240,000 − $10,500 = $229,500.
Video interviewing adoption accelerated dramatically and has become a permanent part of the recruiting toolkit. Organizations that adopted video interviewing reported 50–70% reductions in interview-related travel costs and 30–40% faster time-to-hire for early-stage screening.
Evaluate platforms on: video quality and reliability, one-way interview capabilities, live interview features, ATS integration, candidate experience (mobile app, browser-based), interviewer tools (scorecards, notes, sharing), compliance features (EEOC, data privacy), and analytics/reporting.
Use one-way interviews for initial screening to save the most time. Reserve live video for mid-stage interviews. Use in-person meetings only for final-round candidates where relationship building and culture assessment are critical. This tiered approach optimizes both cost and quality.
Last updated:
Basic platforms start at $3,000–$5,000 per year. Mid-tier solutions with AI features, recordings, and integrations cost $10,000–$25,000. Enterprise platforms with unlimited users, advanced analytics, and white-labeling can exceed $50,000 per year.
One-way (asynchronous) interviews have candidates record responses to pre-set questions on their own time. Live interviews are real-time video conversations. One-way interviews are more cost-effective for screening, while live interviews are better for deeper evaluation.
Travel costs for out-of-area candidates typically include airfare ($200–$600), hotel ($100–$250/night), meals ($50–$100/day), and ground transportation ($50–$100). Total per-candidate travel costs commonly range from $500 to $2,000.
Research shows no significant difference in assessment accuracy between video and in-person interviews when using structured evaluation methods. Some candidates prefer video for convenience, while others may feel less comfortable with the format. Offer accommodations when needed.
Free tools like Zoom or Google Meet work for live interviews but lack recruiting-specific features: one-way recording, candidate scoring, ATS integration, interview guides, and compliance features. For high-volume or regulated hiring, dedicated platforms are worth the investment.
Compare total platform cost against travel savings, recruiter time savings (fewer scheduling logistics), and faster time-to-hire. Also consider qualitative benefits like expanded candidate reach and improved candidate experience for remote applicants.
Calculate annual applicant tracking system costs including per-user licenses, per-requisition fees, and integration expenses. Budget your ATS investment.
Calculate your cost per hire by dividing total internal and external recruiting costs by the number of hires. Benchmark CPH and optimize budgets.
Calculate the incremental cost of diversity hiring initiatives including diverse sourcing, events, ERG support, training, and specialized recruiting efforts.